Guidelines on writing Software specification
Revision as of 16:58, 25 March 2010 by Vladimir.gritsenko (talk | contribs)
Contents
Introduction
A Software Requirements Specification (SRS) is a complete description of the behavior of the system to be developed.
How to write good requirements for software product
See #Template for SRS.
Requirements analysis checklist
The requirements checklist contains a list of questions to ask yourself about your project's requirements. Not all of the checklist questions will apply to your project. If you're working on an informal project, you'll find some that you don't even need to think about. You'll find others that you need to think about but don't need to answer for-mally. If you're working on a large, formal project, however, you may need to consider every one.
Specific Functional Requirements
- Are all the inputs to the system specified, including their source, accuracy, range of values, and frequency?
- Are all the outputs from the system specified, including their destination, accuracy, range of values, frequency, and format?
- Are all output formats specified for web pages, reports, and so on?
- Are all the external hardware and software interfaces specified?
- Are all the external communication interfaces specified, including handshak-ing, error-checking, and communication protocols?
- Are all the tasks the user wants to perform specified?
- Is the data used in each task and the data resulting from each task specified?
Specific Non-Functional (Quality) Requirements
- Is the expected response time, from the user's point of view, specified for all necessary operations?
- Is the level of security specified?
- Is maximum memory specified?
- Is the maximum storage specified?
- Is the definition of success included? Of failure?
Requirements Quality
- Are the requirements clear enough?
- Does each requirement avoid conflicts with other requirements?
- Are the requirements at a fairly consistent level of detail? Should any requirement be specified in more detail?
- Should any requirement be specified in less detail?
- Is each item relevant to the problem and its solution? Can each item be traced to its origin in the problem environment?
- Is each requirement testable? Will it be possible for independent testing to determine whether each requirement has been satisfied?
Requirements Completeness
- Where information isn't available before development begins, are the areas of incompleteness specified?
- Are the requirements complete in the sense that if the product satisfies every requirement, it will be acceptable?
- Are you comfortable with all the requirements? Have you eliminated requirements that are impossible to implement and included just to appease your customer or your boss?
Template for SRS
1. Project summary Опционально. Краткий перечень модификаций, при этом допускается указание цены за каждую модификацию. Описание процесса протекания и результатов продаваемого сервиса. 2. Terms and Definitions Опционально. Определение некоторых нестандартных терминов или переопределение привычных терминов. Ссылки на связанные модификации для пояснения текущей функциональности и терминов. 3. Environment Обязательный пункт. Название продукта, версия, прямой линк на софт, на котором должна быть проведена модификация. 4. Functional requirements Roles: - Store owner - Registered User - Visitor USE CASE "Название use case 1" USE CASE "Название use case 2" USE CASE "Название use case 3" ... USE CASE "Название use case N" 5. Other requirements (non-functional and system) 6. Exclusions [features that are not supposed to be implemented] Опционально. Изменения, упомянутые клиентом, но не получившие развития при обсуждении или намеренно не включенные в спецификацию. Appendixes [graphics and other materials]
Example of SRS
See also
[[1][SRS on Wikipedia]]